Corner set monotonicity: LCSD and RCSI #
Harris (1970) introduced the corner set monotonicity notions (Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas, 2nd ed., §5.2.3):
(X, Y)is left corner set decreasing (LCSD) ifP(X ≤ x, Y ≤ y | X ≤ x', Y ≤ y')is nonincreasing inx'andy';(X, Y)is right corner set increasing (RCSI) ifP(X > x, Y > y | X > x', Y > y')is nondecreasing inx'andy'.
For copulas we state both conditions division-free, cross-multiplying the conditional
probabilities (IsLCSD, IsRCSI); boundary cases with vanishing conditioning probabilities
are then automatically included. We prove
- LCSD is equivalent to total positivity of the copula CDF (
isLCSD_iff_isTP2CDF); - RCSI is equivalent to total positivity of the joint survival function
(u, v) ↦ 1 - u - v + C(u, v)(isRCSI_iff_isTP2_survival), and to LCSD of the survival copula (isRCSI_iff_survivalCopula_isLCSD); these two characterizations are covered by Nelsen's Theorem 5.2.15 and Corollary 5.2.17 (TP2 ofC̄is equivalent to TP2 of the survival copulaĈ(u, v) = C̄(1 - u, 1 - v)); - both notions are symmetric in the coordinates;
- LCSD implies LTD in both directions, RCSI implies RTI in both directions (Nelsen §5.2.3), hence both imply PQD;
MandΠare LCSD and RCSI, whileWis neither.
Left corner set decreasing, in cross-multiplied form:
P(U ≤ u, V ≤ v | U ≤ a, V ≤ b) is nonincreasing in (a, b).
Equations
Instances For
Right corner set increasing, in cross-multiplied form:
P(U > u, V > v | U > a, V > b) is nondecreasing in (a, b).
Equations
Instances For
A two-step argument for TP2 functions #
LCSD #
LCSD implies left tail decreasingness of V given U (Nelsen, §5.2.3).
RCSI #
The bivariate joint survival function as a CDF value of the survival copula.
RCSI of a copula is LCSD of its survival copula.
RCSI implies right tail increasingness of V given U (Nelsen, §5.2.3).