Limits at θ → ∞ of Nelsen's families 17 and 21 #
Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas, second edition, Table 4.1 lists the limiting case
C_∞ = M for families 17 and 21. Both are proved here as pointwise convergence of the CDFs
along any filter on which the parameter tends to +∞ (tendsto_nelsen21_atTop,
tendsto_nelsen17_atTop). Since every copula lies below M, only a lower bound is needed:
- family 21: with
s = 1 − u,t = 1 − v,w = max(s, t), Bernoulli's inequality givesC_θ(u, v) ≥ 1 − (2θ)^{1/θ} w, and(2θ)^{1/θ} → 1; - family 17: with
z = min(u, v),C_θ(u, v) ≥ (2 / (1 − 2^{−θ}))^{−1/θ} (1 + z) − 1, and the factor tends to1.
For family 17 at θ → −∞ the limit is not W: it is
max(0, ((1 + u)(1 + v) − 2)/2) = max(0, (uv + u + v − 1)/2), the member θ = 1/2 of family 7
(tendsto_nelsen17_atBot). With κ = −θ, r = (1 + u)(1 + v)/2 and
P = (1 − (1 + u)^{−κ})(1 − (1 + v)^{−κ}), the CDF satisfies
max(1, rP) − 1 ≤ C_θ(u, v) ≤ 3^{1/κ} max(1, r) − 1 (nelsen17_bounds_neg).
(2r)^{1/r} → 1 as r → ∞.
The limit M of Nelsen's family 21 as θ → ∞ (Table 4.1), pointwise on the unit square.
The limit M of Nelsen's family 17 as θ → ∞ (Table 4.1), pointwise on the unit square.
Two-sided bounds for family 17 at negative parameters θ ≤ −1 (with κ = −θ):
max(1, r P) − 1 ≤ C_θ(u, v) ≤ 3^{1/κ} max(1, r) − 1, r = (1 + u)(1 + v)/2,
P = (1 − (1 + u)^{−κ})(1 − (1 + v)^{−κ}).
The limit of Nelsen's family 17 as θ → −∞: pointwise convergence to
max(0, (uv + u + v − 1)/2), the member θ = 1/2 of Nelsen's family 7 (not W).