Documentation

Papers.Rockel2026XiFootrule.ClosedCoefficients

← Mathematical handbook

Proposition 3.1 and the admissible parameter in Theorem 3.3 #

The cubic inverse is unique on [0,2] for target footrule in [-1/2,0]. Uniqueness among all real roots would be false, as checked below.

theorem Papers.Rockel2026XiFootrule.relaxed_coefficients_closed (μ : ℝ) (hμ : μ ∈ Set.Icc 0 2) :
have r := 2 / (2 + μ); Verification.relaxedFootrule μ = -2 * r ^ 2 + 6 * r - 5 + 1 / r ∧ Verification.relaxedXi μ = -4 * r ^ 2 + 20 * r - 17 + 2 / r - 1 / r ^ 2 - 12 * Real.log r

Proposition 3.1, evaluated from the source's exact integral definitions.

Every nonpositive target footrule has exactly one admissible parameter.

theorem Papers.Rockel2026XiFootrule.footrule_cubic_equivalence (y μ : ℝ) (hμ : μ ∈ Set.Icc 0 2) :
Verification.relaxedFootrule μ = y ↔ μ ^ 3 - (4 + 2 * y) * μ ^ 2 - (4 + 8 * y) * μ - 8 * y = 0
theorem Papers.Rockel2026XiFootrule.footrule_cubic_unique_admissible (y : ℝ) (hy : y ∈ Set.Icc (-1 / 2) 0) :
∃! μ : ℝ, μ ∈ Set.Icc 0 2 ∧ μ ^ 3 - (4 + 2 * y) * μ ^ 2 - (4 + 8 * y) * μ - 8 * y = 0

The source's phrase "unique real solution" needs the admissible interval restriction.