Schur order of functions: rearrangements versus convex tests #
For measurable f g : I → [0,1], the rearrangement form of the Schur order
∫_0^x f* ≤ ∫_0^x g* (all x) with equal integrals is equivalent to
∫ φ(f) ≤ ∫ φ(g) for all continuous φ convex on [0,1] (Hardy–Littlewood–Pólya).
Schur order of functions via decreasing rearrangements (Ansari–Rockel, Definition 2.2).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Schur order of functions via continuous convex tests.
Equations
- Verification.ConvexSchurLE f g = ∀ (φ : ℝ → ℝ), Continuous φ → ConvexOn ℝ (Set.Icc 0 1) φ → ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), φ (f u) ≤ ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), φ (g u)
Instances For
Partial integrals of an antitone rearrangement at its own level.
Convex tests imply the rearrangement Schur order.
The rearrangement Schur order implies all hinge comparisons.
Piecewise-linear convex interpolation #
Linear interpolation of φ at the nodes k/n, written with hinge functions.
Equations
- Verification.hingeInterp φ n y = φ 0 + Verification.cellSlope φ n 0 * y + ∑ k ∈ Finset.Ico 1 n, (Verification.cellSlope φ n k - Verification.cellSlope φ n (k - 1)) * max (y - ↑k / ↑n) 0
Instances For
Integral comparison for the hinge interpolant.
Majorization in the hinge form implies all continuous convex comparisons.
Hardy–Littlewood–Pólya on the unit interval, for [0,1]-valued functions.