The exact Spearman rho-footrule region via optimal transport with applications to finite rankings, mixability, and Chatterjee's rank correlation
arXiv preprint
The exact rho-footrule and mean-variance regions, finite-ranking inequalities, mixability infimum, and xi/correlation-ratio outer bounds are checked. Example 2.8 has its exact folded-uniform law, xi=1/4 and eta=0. Example 2.9 has a uniform quantitative gap. Proposition 2.10 is checked in full: the lower curve, every localized upper branch, compactness and full projection of the seed set, the attained concave upper envelope, and the entire inner enclosure. Remark 2.2 has the exact finite-ranking equality/divisibility criterion and strict correction away from contact means. Both finite-ranking moment bounds are asymptotically sharp at every admissible mean, via uniform approximation by actual permutation shuffles. The full comparison with the earlier rho-footrule curve is checked: equality on [-1/2,1/4], every contact point and the endpoint, and strict improvement on both line segments of every later contact interval. Compactness of the full xi-eta region and upper-maximum attainment at every xi are checked, including the quantitative quarter-xi maximum. Uniqueness of the optimizing copula is checked on every upper arc, at all junctions, and at the endpoint, including nonsymmetric and singular competitors. The stated main-result scope is complete.
Verification map
Status: complete for stated scope. The exact rho-footrule and mean-variance regions, finite-ranking inequalities, mixability infimum, and xi/correlation-ratio outer bounds are checked. Example 2.8 has its exact folded-uniform law, xi=1/4 and eta=0. Example 2.9 has a uniform quantitative gap. Proposition 2.10 is checked in full: the lower curve, every localized upper branch, compactness and full projection of the seed set, the attained concave upper envelope, and the entire inner enclosure. Remark 2.2 has the exact finite-ranking equality/divisibility criterion and strict correction away from contact means. Both finite-ranking moment bounds are asymptotically sharp at every admissible mean, via uniform approximation by actual permutation shuffles. The full comparison with the earlier rho-footrule curve is checked: equality on [-1/2,1/4], every contact point and the endpoint, and strict improvement on both line segments of every later contact interval. Compactness of the full xi-eta region and upper-maximum attainment at every xi are checked, including the quantitative quarter-xi maximum. Uniqueness of the optimizing copula is checked on every upper arc, at all junctions, and at the endpoint, including nonsymmetric and singular competitors. The stated main-result scope is complete.
Source and conventions
Source: arXiv:2608.20176v1, 20 August 2026.
The copula is a probability measure with uniform marginals. Rho uses 12 E[UV]-3 and footrule uses 6 integral C(t,t) dt-2. The exact moment identities are rho=1-6 E[(U-V)^2] and footrule=1-3 E[abs(U-V)]. The quadratic envelope follows from nonnegativity of the centered second moment. It is the classical upper bound in equations (16)-(17), not the article's sharper piecewise optimal boundary. No absolute-continuity hypothesis is added.
The contact family uses N equal diagonal blocks of a half-turn shuffle. Its coefficient values reach the universal quadratic bound, which proves global optimality at all discrete contact points without assuming the article's transport correction.
Result map
Proofs are in Moments.lean and Touchpoints.lean, imported by Main.lean. Axioms.lean prints and enforces the standard transitive axiom allowlist for every declaration below.
| Source result | Lean declaration | Status | Hypotheses and scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lemma 3.2 / equation (4): moment representation | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.moment_representation |
verified | Every bivariate copula, including singular couplings. |
| Section 1.2, equations (16)-(17): quadratic upper bound | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quadratic_upper_bound |
verified | Rho<=1-(2/3)(1-footrule)^2 for every copula; the equality criterion, discrete attaining points and sharp correction are checked below. |
| Proof of Corollary 1.2: fixed-footrule interpolation | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.fixed_footrule_intermediate |
verified | Supplied copulas have equal footrule and bracket the target rho; all sharp endpoints are constructed below. |
| Section 1.2, equations (16)-(22): exact variance defect | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quadratic_defect; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quadratic_equality_iff |
verified | The quadratic upper bound is an equality iff abs(U-V)=(1-footrule)/3 almost surely; no symmetry or density assumption. |
| Section 1.2 / contact point N=1: half-turn witness | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.halfTurn_rho; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.halfTurn_footrule |
verified | A genuine reflected ordinal-sum copula with rho=footrule=-1/2. |
| Theorem 1.1 / Proposition 1.6: every discrete contact point | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.contactCopula_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.contactCopula_maximizes_rho; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.contactCopula_constant_displacement |
verified | For every N=n+1>=1, constructs footrule=1-3/(2N), rho=1-3/(2N^2), proves global maximality at that footrule, and abs(U-V)=1/(2N) almost surely. Optimizer uniqueness is proved below for every upper-boundary parameter. |
| Theorem 1.1: explicit upper-boundary copulas and their coefficients | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.boundary_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperRho_parameter |
verified | All left/right arcs and the endpoint. The upper boundary is selected from explicit arithmetic coordinates, not postulated as an optimizer. |
| Theorem 1.1: global sharp upper bound and attainment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.sharp_upper_bound; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_boundary_attained |
verified | Every copula, including singular laws; every footrule in [-1/2,1], including all contact points and junctions. |
| Theorem 1.1, equation (9): closed radical formula | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.right_boundary_closed; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.left_boundary_closed |
verified | Both halves of every interval, with delta=N(N+1)v^2 and the respective endpoint ell. The term delta*sqrt(delta) is delta^(3/2) on this nonnegative domain. |
| Corollary 1.2: sharp lower boundary and attainment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.sharp_lower_bound; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.lower_boundary_attained |
verified | The full interval [-1/2,1]; lower rho=-1+2(sqrt((1+2p)/3))^3, with actual attaining copulas. |
| Corollary 1.2: full exact region | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.exact_region |
verified | Necessary and sufficient conditions in the source order (rho,footrule); every intermediate rho is attained. |
| Theorem 1.1: agreement of boundary values at junctions | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.boundary_value_unique |
verified | Uniqueness of the boundary value. This is not a uniqueness theorem for optimizing copulas. |
| Proposition 1.6(i)-(ii): sharp dispersion bound and attainment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.sharp_second_moment; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.minimum_variance_attained |
verified | Every prescribed mean m in [0,1/2]. The variance correction is linked to the proved sharp boundary, and an actual copula attains it. |
| Proposition 1.6, equation (18): evaluated variance correction | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.right_variance_closed; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.left_variance_closed |
verified | Both arc halves give 2deltasqrt(delta)/(3*sqrt(N(N+1)))-delta^2. |
| Proposition 1.6(iii): nonnegativity and exact zero set | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.minimum_variance_nonneg; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.minimum_variance_zero_iff |
verified | Exactly m=0 or m=1/(2N) for a positive integer N. |
| Theorem 2.4: attainable constant magnitudes | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.constant_displacement_iff |
verified | Copula-law formulation: abs(U-V) is constant exactly at the stated means. The source centered-sum coordinates are Uprime=U-1/2 and Vprime=1/2-V. |
| Corollary 1.7: admissible means and variance identity | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.meanDistance_mem; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.distanceVariance_eq |
verified | Every copula; variance is the actual integral of squared centered absolute displacement. |
| Corollary 1.7: both variance bounds and maximum attainment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.sharp_variance_bounds; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.minimumVariance_le_maximumVariance; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.maximum_variance_attained |
verified | Every mean in [0,1/2]; maximum variance is (1-(sqrt(1-2m))^3)/3-m^2, attained by an actual copula. |
| Remark 1.8(a): the exact mean-variance region | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.exact_mean_variance_region |
verified | Necessary and sufficient conditions; every intermediate variance is attained. |
| Remark 1.8(c): the universal variance maximum | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.maximumVariance_global_bound; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.universal_variance_bounds; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.maximumVariance_at_maximizer; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.universal_variance_maximum_attained |
verified | The exact maximum 5(3-sqrt(5))/24 is attained at footrule (7-3sqrt(5))/4. |
| Theorem 2.1: finite-ranking normalization and inequalities | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_mean; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_second_moment; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.finite_ranking_bounds |
verified | Every permutation of n+1 items; actual shuffle moments are D/(n+1)^2 and S/(n+1)^3, yielding both corrected bounds. |
| Remark 2.2: unnormalized Cauchy-Schwarz correction | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.finite_ranking_cauchy_correction |
verified | S >= D^2/(n+1) + (n+1)^3 Vmin(D/(n+1)^2). Discrete equality and asymptotic sharpness are verified below. |
| Theorem 2.4: centered-sum law and statistics | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.centered_sum_law; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.centered_sum_statistics |
verified | Reflection identifies all continuous test-function integrals and both optimization statistics for centered uniforms. |
| Theorem 2.4: attained generalized mixability infimum | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.mixability_minimum; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.mixability_infimum; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.mixability_zero_iff |
verified | The constrained infimum equals Vmin(m), is attained, and is zero exactly at zero and reciprocal positive even integers. |
| Proposition 1.6 / Theorem 2.4: arbitrary probability spaces | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.centered_sum_variance_bound |
verified | Any measurable random vector with uniform coordinate laws; both centered uniforms are represented explicitly by subtracting 1/2. |
| Section 2.3, equations (38)-(40): conditional-copy copula | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.conditional_copies_cdf; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.conditional_copies_coefficients |
verified | Constructs the genuine copula with CDF integral F(t,u)F(t,v); its footrule is xi and its rho is 12 times the conditional-mean variance. |
| Theorem 2.6: xi/correlation-ratio outer bounds | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.xi_correlationRatio_bounds |
verified | All copulas, including singular laws. Both exact rho-footrule bounds and eta <= 2 xi are proved without monotonicity assumptions. |
| Example 2.9: strictness of the conditional Cauchy-Schwarz bound | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.correlationRatio_equality_iff; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quarter_xi_strict_bound |
verified | Equality eta=2xi occurs iff xi=0; in particular every copula with xi=1/4 has eta<1/2. Uniform separation and attainment of the upper maximum are proved below. |
| Example 2.8: the stated folded-uniform law | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.foldedExample_joint_law; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.foldedExample_uniform_predictor; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.foldedExample_conditionalCDF; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.foldedExample_conditionalMean |
verified | The copula is exactly the law of (abs(2U-1), U), both margins are uniform, and the conditional law is equally supported at (1-r)/2 and (1+r)/2 with mean 1/2. |
| Example 2.8: exact coefficients and attainment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.foldedExample_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quarter_xi_zero_ratio_attained |
verified | The original folded example has xi=1/4 and eta=0; xi is evaluated from its actual conditional distribution. |
| Example 2.9: uniform non-sharpness certificate | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.correlationRatio_uniform_improvement; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quarter_xi_uniform_gap; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quarter_xi_uniform_separation |
verified | Every copula satisfies (21/20)eta <= 2xi+3/250. At xi=1/4, eta <= 256/525, leaving a uniform gap 13/1050 below 1/2. This proves strictness even for the supremum without a compactness premise. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (44): horizontal inner segment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.zero_ratio_interval_attained |
verified | For every xi in [0,1/4], an explicit mixture of the folded example with independence attains eta=0, including both endpoints. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (44): central-revelation construction | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.partialReveal_conditional_distribution; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.partialReveal_coefficients |
verified | An actual copula reveals a central interval of length t and pairs the remaining response ranks. Its exact coefficients are xi=(1+3t^2)/4 and eta=t^3, including both endpoints. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (44): complete lower inner curve | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.lowerInnerRatio_formula; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.curved_lower_inner_attained; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.lower_inner_attained |
verified | Every xi in [0,1] attains the stated ordinate: zero up to 1/4 and ((4xi-1)/3)^(3/2) thereafter. The real-exponent convention is checked. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equations (117)-(118): convexity | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.tagged_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.directional_region_convex; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.convex_hull_attained; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.directional_vertical_interval |
verified | Tagging component conditional models on disjoint predictor blocks gives genuine copulas with both coefficients affine. All convex combinations, convex hulls of attained sets, and vertical intervals between attained points are realized. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (120): binary upper construction | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperBinary_conditional_distribution; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperBinary_conditionalMean; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperBinary_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_binary_attained |
verified | The flat-topped tent model has xi=2a^2(3-4a) and eta=12a^2(1-a)^2 for every a in [0,1/2]. This is the n=1 upper branch; the higher localized branches and envelope are verified below. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (120): all diagonal localizations | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ordinal_directional_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.equal_block_directional_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperLocalized_coefficients; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_branch_attained |
verified | Identifies the conditional construction with the package ordinal sum. Both coefficient formulas hold for arbitrary base copulas and all weights. Every positive equal-block count realizes the stated upper branch. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (45): the full upper seed set | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_limit_attained; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_branch_continuous; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_seeds_attained; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_convex_hull_attained |
verified | Includes the comonotonic limit point. Every finite branch is continuous, and the full seed set and its convex hull consist of attained copula coefficient pairs. |
| Proposition 2.10: compactness of seeds and convexification | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_seeds_compact; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_convex_hull_compact |
verified | The seeds are a continuous image of the compact reciprocal sequence with its limit times the binary parameter interval. Caratheodory reduces the plane convex hull to compact joins of three points. |
| Proposition 2.10: full horizontal projection | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_branch_covers_below_one; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_seed_at_each_x; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.directional_region_bounds; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_seeds_projection |
verified | For x<1 the floor of 1/(1-x) and an intermediate-value argument select a finite branch. The projection is exactly [0,1]; all actual coefficient pairs lie in the unit square. |
| Proposition 2.10: attained concave upper envelope | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperInnerRatio_isGreatest; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_inner_attained; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperInnerRatio_mem; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_inner_concave |
verified | Each compact vertical slice has a maximum, equal to the stated supremum. Its ordinate is attained by an actual copula, belongs to [0,1], and is concave in x. |
| Proposition 2.10 / equation (46): complete inner enclosure | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.le_upperInnerRatio; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.lowerInnerRatio_le_self; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.inner_curve_order; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.full_inner_enclosure |
verified | The lower curve is at most x and the upper envelope is at least x. Every ordinate between them is attained, including all endpoints. No outer-region compactness assumption is used. |
| Remark 2.2: exact discrete equality and strictness | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_cauchy_equality_iff; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_constant_contact_iff; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_contact_equality_exists_iff; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.finite_ranking_strict_correction |
verified | Ordinary Cauchy-Schwarz equality is equivalent to constant absolute rank displacement. At normalized mean 1/(2N), an equality permutation of positive size m exists iff 2N divides m. The proof constructs repeated swaps of adjacent blocks and proves the converse from the first rank. Away from all contact means the correction is strictly positive. |
| Theorem 1.1 / Proposition 5.8: uniqueness of the optimizing copula | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.boundary_optimizer_unique; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_boundary_exists_unique; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.boundary_copula_junction |
verified | Every footrule in [-1/2,1], both arc families, all contacts, junctions and the endpoint. A strictly Lipschitz feasible dual forces optimizers onto a forward graph and its transpose; a finite-strip marginal recursion proves uniqueness, including nonsymmetric and singular copulas. |
| Remark 1.4: earlier curve equality on the first interval | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.earlier_first_radical; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.earlier_second_radical |
verified | Both printed radical formulas equal the sharp boundary throughout their closed domains [-1/2,-1/8] and [-1/8,1/4]. Nonnegative powers of order 3/2 are written as cubes of square roots. |
| Remark 1.4: every earlier contact and the endpoint | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.earlier_contact; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.earlier_endpoint; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.oldContactRho_eq_quadratic |
verified | At each x_N, N>=2, the earlier line and the sharp boundary coincide with u(x_N); both have value 1 at the endpoint. |
| Remark 1.4: strict improvement between later contacts | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.earlier_left_strict; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.earlier_right_strict |
verified | Uses exactly the printed rational z_N and w_N. Every interior point of (x_N,x_(N+1)), N>=2, lies strictly below the sharp boundary on its corresponding earlier line segment. The corner is included in both proofs. |
| Supporting boundary shape | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperRho_concave |
verified | Concavity of the actual attained upper rho boundary, from copula mixtures. Combined with an explicit strictly positive corner gap, it yields both strict line comparisons. |
| Example 2.9: full-region compactness and upper-maximum attainment | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.directional_region_compact; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upperRatio_isGreatest; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.upper_ratio_attained; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.quarter_xi_maximum |
verified | The full attainable xi-eta region is compact. Every vertical slice has a maximum attained by an actual copula; at xi=1/4 it is at most 256/525. The proof uses compact laws of conditional distributions with uniform barycenter, realizes every such law by a copula, and expresses both coefficients as continuous integral costs. |
| Remark 2.2: general finite-ranking approximation | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_moment_limits | verified | Every copula admits permutations of sizes N=1,2,... whose D/N^2 and S/N^3 approach its first absolute displacement moment and second moment. Proved by iid rank construction, an explicit uniform CDF rate, and continuity bounds for rho and footrule. |
| Remark 2.2: both asymptotically sharp moment bounds | Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_lower_asymptotic_sharp; Papers.AnsariRockel2026RhoFootrule.ranking_upper_asymptotic_sharp | verified | For each prescribed mean m in [0,1/2], actual finite permutations approach (m,m^2+Vmin(m)) and (m,(1-sqrt(1-2m)^3)/3), respectively. Endpoints are included. Means approach m; exact attainment for each finite size is not asserted. |
The completed scope comprises the mapped main results: Theorem 1.1, Corollary 1.2, Proposition 1.6, Corollary 1.7, Theorems 2.1, 2.4 and 2.6, Examples 2.8 and 2.9, Proposition 2.10, and the mapped refinements and applications. Supporting transport arguments are verified in the concrete forms needed for these conclusions; this does not separately assert every abstract auxiliary statement or externally cited theorem. Numerical experiments and plots are outside the formal scope.
Latest package integration
The dependency is pinned to copula commit
5926399c46f83d307127fd34b3aa2e416c940786. New application modules: MeanVariance.lean, VarianceMaximum.lean, FiniteRankings.lean, CorrelationRatio.lean, Mixability.lean.
Every mapped declaration is compiled and transitively audited against the standard
Lean axiom allowlist. Uniqueness of a numerical boundary value does not imply
uniqueness of its copula witness.
The folded model is proved by an explicit two-uniform sampler and then identified with the stated single-uniform graph law. Exact conditional-CDF integration gives xi=1/4; the constant conditional mean gives eta=0. The quantitative gap uses the endpoint bounds of every conditional CDF, so it does not assume compactness of the attainable set. Independence mixtures scale both xi and eta quadratically and supply the entire horizontal inner segment.
The central-revelation kernel preserves the uniform response marginal by an exact prefix-integral identity. Its conditional-CDF squares and conditional-mean variance give the entire lower inner curve. The upper binary model uses the flat-topped tent min(a,v,1-v), whose first two moments are evaluated exactly. Predictor tagging proves xi-eta convexity directly for arbitrary copulas, without assuming that either coefficient is affine under ordinary copula mixtures.
Proposition 2.10 is now complete. The affine conditional-block model is identified with the imported ordinal-sum copula, so its directional coefficient formulas apply to the package constructor, including singular components. Every upper seed and every point of its convex hull has a genuine copula witness. Compactness of the seed hull proves existence of the displayed inner upper maximum. Independently, laws of conditional distributions with a uniform barycenter form a compact space whose continuous coefficient image is exactly the entire attainable region. This proves full-region compactness and upper-boundary attainment without assuming weak continuity of xi on ordinary copula laws.
Optimizer uniqueness uses the package's exact dual potentials and their sharp Lipschitz bounds. Rademacher differentiability gives a unique upper contact almost everywhere; strict negativity excludes diagonal contact. Decomposing any optimizer into the forward graph and its transpose gives two marginal equations, whose finite-strip recursion identifies both component measures. The proof establishes equality of actual copulas and does not assume symmetry of an optimizer.
Inspect the formalization
Reproduce this snapshot
Run the full project build to check every source file. The pinned toolchain and dependencies live at the repository root.
git clone https://github.com/Corrram/lean-verifications.git
cd lean-verifications
git checkout --detach 0ac8668a9c4c9007ec374694abc14296edbeae75
lake exe cache get
lake buildCite this supplement
Use the permanent folder at commit 0ac8668 to identify the exact software snapshot. Cite the original article separately. This handbook follows the latest deployed commit.
Article bibliography (BibTeX)
@misc{AnsariRockel2026RhoFootruleArxiv,
author = {Ansari, Jonathan and Rockel, Marcus},
title = {The exact Spearman rho-footrule region via optimal transport with applications to finite rankings, mixability, and Chatterjee's rank correlation},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2608.20176},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {math.ST},
note = {Version 1, 20 August 2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20176v1}
}
% Cite the Lean supplement separately using its folder and full commit permalink.