General order results, with explicit existence assumptions for tail limits #
Proposition 3.2(i), including singular copulas.
Proposition 3.2(ii), for directional conditional increase (CIS).
Proposition 3.2(iii), using continuous convex tests of the conditional CDF.
Lemma 2.9 in copula form: both classical concordance coefficients are monotone.
The copula specialization of Lemma 2.10, with the stated conditioning direction.
Lemma 2.12: lower tails, provided both limits exist.
Lemma 2.12: upper tails, provided both limits exist.
Lemma 2.6(i): Schur comparison with a CIS copula implies lower orthant comparison.
Lemma 2.8(i): Schur comparison with a CDS copula reverses the orthant direction.
Lemma 2.6(ii): exact equivalence on the CIS class, without density assumptions.
Lemma 2.8(ii): exact equivalence on the CDS class, with reversed orthant order.