Theorem 2 and the equality cases in Lemma 8 #
The copula statements have no density or parametric-family restriction. For the scalar lemma, equality of functions is almost everywhere: integrals cannot distinguish choices on null sets, including interval endpoints. The proof uses pairwise moment defects, rather than the source's maximum-principle argument.
The functional F_v from Lemma 8; its admissible functions have mean v.
Equations
- Papers.AnsariRockel2026XiRho.decreasingFunctional g = ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), 2 * ((1 - ↑u) * g u) - g u ^ 2
Instances For
theorem
Papers.AnsariRockel2026XiRho.lemma8_bound
{g : ↑unitInterval → ℝ}
(hg : Antitone g)
(hb : ∀ (u : ↑unitInterval), g u ∈ Set.Icc 0 1)
(v : ↑unitInterval)
(hm : ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), g u = ↑v)
:
Lemma 8, inequality, including the mean endpoints.
theorem
Papers.AnsariRockel2026XiRho.lemma8_equality
{g : ↑unitInterval → ℝ}
(hg : Antitone g)
(hb : ∀ (u : ↑unitInterval), g u ∈ Set.Icc 0 1)
(v : ↑unitInterval)
(hm : ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), g u = ↑v)
:
decreasingFunctional g = ↑v * (1 - ↑v) ↔ (∀ᵐ (u : ↑unitInterval), g u = ↑v) ∨ g =ᵐ[MeasureTheory.volume] (Set.Iic v).indicator fun (x : ↑unitInterval) => 1
Lemma 8, equality classification modulo null sets.
theorem
Papers.AnsariRockel2026XiRho.si_xi_eq_rho_iff
(C : ProbabilityTheory.Copula 2)
(hC : C.IsSI)
:
theorem
Papers.AnsariRockel2026XiRho.stochastic_xi_eq_abs_rho_iff
(C : ProbabilityTheory.Copula 2)
(hC : C.IsSI ∨ C.IsSD)
:
Theorem 2: the full equality classification.
theorem
Papers.AnsariRockel2026XiRho.stochastic_xi_lt_abs_rho
(C : ProbabilityTheory.Copula 2)
(hC : C.IsSI ∨ C.IsSD)
(hw : C ≠ ProbabilityTheory.Copula.countermonotonic)
(hp : C ≠ ProbabilityTheory.Copula.independence 2)
(hm : C ≠ ProbabilityTheory.Copula.comonotonic 2)
: