Documentation

Papers.AnsariRockel2024.Rearrangement

← Mathematical handbook

Rearrangement-based Schur order (Lemma 2.4, Lemma 2.7, Proposition 3.1) #

The paper defines D ≤_{∂₁S} E by comparing decreasing rearrangements of the partial derivatives ∂₁D(·,v) and ∂₁E(·,v) (Definition 2.3). The library order SchurLE compares the conditional distributions through continuous convex tests. Lemma 2.4 is their equivalence; it combines the almost-everywhere derivative bridge with the Hardy–Littlewood–Pólya theorem on the unit interval.

Definition 2.3: D ≤_{∂₁S} E via decreasing rearrangements of ∂₁D(·,v).

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
    theorem Papers.AnsariRockel2024.schur_endpoint_trivial (D E : ProbabilityTheory.Copula 2) (v : ↑unitInterval) (hv : v = 0 ∨ v = 1) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) :
    ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), φ (D.conditionalCDF u v) = ∫ (u : ↑unitInterval), φ (E.conditionalCDF u v)

    Lemma 2.4: the rearrangement Schur order of partial derivatives coincides with the Schur order of conditional distributions (convex-test form).

    Lemma 2.7(i): E↓ ≤_lo D ≤_lo E↑ for every D ≤_{∂₁S} E, and both bounds belong to the class.

    Uniqueness of the lower-orthant maximum and minimum.

    The increasing rearrangement in explicit form E↑(u,v)=∫_0^u (∂₁E(·,v))*.